Hart on Bush

HART ON BUSH….Here’s some more right-on-right mudslinging from our current issue. The author of this one is Jeffrey Hart, a longtime National Review editor so conservative that I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that he considered Barry Goldwater slightly unreliable. But George Bush? That’s a bridge too far:

Today, the standard-bearer of ?conservatism? in the United States is George W. Bush, a man who has taken the positions of an unshakable ideologue: on supply-side economics, on privatization, on Social Security, on the Terri Schiavo case, and, most disastrously, on Iraq. Never before has a United States president consistently adhered to beliefs so disconnected from actuality.

….As Bush?s ideology leads from one disaster to another, one might ask: How far can it go? It has already brought us to Baghdad, an adventure so hopeless that [William F.] Buckley recently mused, ?If you had a European prime minister who experienced what we?ve experienced, it would be expected that he would retire or resign.? The more we learn about what happened behind the scenes in the months leading up to the war in Iraq, the more apparent it becomes that evidence was twisted to fit preconceived notions. Those who produced evidence undermining the case for war were ignored or even punished. It was zealotry at its most calamitous.

Who can argue with that? But remember: if you want to see more pieces like this, you won’t find them in National Review. You’ll find them in the Washington Monthly. So please help us stay alive by donating some money or buying a subscription.

To donate, click the ad (or click here) which takes you to a page that allows you to write a check or donate online. You can buy a subscription to the magazine here, or buy a gift subscription here. Or donate via PayPal here: