Voting for Governor

VOTING FOR GOVERNOR….Yes, I know, as a good Democrat I should vote against the recall. And maybe I will. Instead, I have a deal for all the (serious) candidates:

If any of you actually has the guts to propose a serious and mathematically plausible plan that balances the California budget, I will vote to recall Davis and then vote for you.

“Serious,” by the way, excludes the following:

  • Anything that lowers our credit rating to the point where even Michael Milkin would be embarrassed to buy California state bonds.

  • Raising the cigarette tax to $100 a pack.

  • Eliminating all K-3 schooling.

  • Pretending that there is $38 billion worth of “waste” that can be magically hacked away.

  • Anything that involves children donating the quarters they get from the tooth fairy.

There you have it. Propose a solution, and you get both my vote and the valuable endorsement of the Calpundit blog.

On the off chance that more than one candidate does this, I will be forced to go through the dreary process of examining their plans and deciding which one I like better. However, I doubt very much that it will come down to that.

UPDATE: Michael Hiltzik’s recall column in the LA Times today is pretty entertaining. Favorite line:

To believe that it would mean a significant improvement in state governance to replace Gray Davis with Bill Simon is like thinking that if Moe can’t handle a job, the answer is to bring in Larry or Curly.

The column is a little hard to read since the Times website has inexplicably removed all the paragraph breaks, but it’s worth plowing through anyway.

UPDATE 2: Arnold says he’s going to present a detailed plan for dealing with “these kinds of problems” real soon. Hopefully it will be a detailed plan for dealing with our actual problem, not merely our “kind” of problem. In any case, I shall be waiting with bated breath.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation