Losing the War, Part 456

LOSING THE WAR, PART 456….Hilzoy points out the following wording in the Graham/Warner bill on military commissions. The subject at hand is coercive interrogation of suspected terrorists:

….it shall be a defense that such officer, employee, member of the Armed Forces, or other agent did not know that the practices were unlawful….Good faith reliance on advice of counsel should be an important factor, among others, to consider in assessing whether a person of ordinary sense and understanding would have known the practices to be unlawful.

I guess this isn’t quite “I was just following orders,” but a person of ordinary sense and understanding would sure have a mighty hard time figuring the distinction.

In any case, Hilzoy is actually more concerned with the habeus corpus provisions, which apply to everyone, even those known to be innocent of wrongdoing. That’s your “moral basis” for the war on terror right there. Go read.

Washington Monthly - Donate today and your gift will be doubled!

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation