Maliki’s Departure Good News/Bad News for Obama

While many of us were focused on Ferguson, Missouri yesterday, a dramatic event was unfolding in Baghdad, as embattled Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki stepped aside peacefully and accepted–even endorsed–his replacement by Haider al-Adabi.

This was obviously a welcome development for the Obama administration. But on the other hand, as a L.A. Times analysis put it, the prospect of a new government means Obama is obligated to “open the Pentagon spigot wider,” and more generally and conspicuously involve the U.S. in the Iraqi civil war.

Perhaps a new government can make short work of IS, and perhaps the implicit alliance between the U.S. and Iran to back Adabi will bear fruit there and even elsewhere. But unless conditions improve rapidly, it’s going to get harder and harder for Obama to square U.S. military activity with the claim that for the United States the Iraq War is truly over.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation

Ed Kilgore

Ed Kilgore, a Monthly contributing editor, is a columnist for the Daily Intelligencer, New York magazine’s politics blog, and the managing editor for the Democratic Strategist.