JACQUES CHIRAC, TERROR MASTER….Michael Ledeen has long been one of the more, um, visionary thinkers among conservative hawks, essentially advocating U.S. military action against the entire Middle East. Today Digby points us to Ledeen’s latest missive, an effort to understand those darn French and explain why they willfully continue to oppose us in the face of our obvious righteousness:
So the French and the Germans struck a deal with radical Islam and with radical Arabs: You go after the United States, and we’ll do everything we can to protect you, and we will do everything we can to weaken the Americans.
The Franco-German strategy was based on using Arab and Islamic extremism and terrorism as the weapon of choice, and the United Nations as the straitjacket for blocking a decisive response from the United States.
As near as I can tell, this is the conservative version of the “It’s all about oil” argument from lefty peace activists. France has always considered itself a counterweight to the United States in the Arab world, so there’s probably a kernel of truth in the idea that their position is partly an effort to curry favor with Arab states.
Unfortunately, that thesis isn’t interesting enough for Ledeen, who insists on making it into some grand conspiracy theory in which, Illuminati-like, Jacques Chirac is secretly Osama’s right hand man, plotting terrorist attacks as a way of keeping the perfidious Americans too busy to export their lousy Hollywood movies to Paris.
As Digby points out, it’s one thing for a few crazy bloggers to say stuff like this, but “Michael Ledeen gets invited to the White House. He is crazy as a loon.” Maybe he should get together with the Bible Code nutcase who’s been helping out our intelligence analysts.
MORE CATS!….War getting you down? Go take a look at Digby’s swimming cat and Gianna’s Valentine Cat lookalike.
The Drum family motto has always been “You can never have too many cats.” In sober reality this has occasionally turned out not to be true, but the sentiment is accurate….
“AS IF WE WERE IN GRAMMAR SCHOOL”….Were the questions at last week’s presidential press conference pre-approved? David Appell has the answer.
FIRST TURKEY, NOW BRITAIN?….
This morning a reporter asked Donald Rumsfeld if we would go to war without Britain. He said:
To the extent they are able to participate — in the event that the president decides to use force — that would obviously be welcomed. To the extent they’re not, there are work-arounds and they would not be involved, at least in that phase…
Now, to Americans this seemed like just another case of good old straight shooting Don Rumsfeld. After all, there’s been a lot of news about backbench rebellion in the Labor Party, ministers resigning if Tony Blair commits troops without UN approval, and Blair’s stress-induced ill health, so it’s only natural that the Pentagon is planning what to do if Britain does indeed decide to pull out of the coalition.
But the real story here is how Rumsfeld’s comments show once again the Bush administration’s almost pathological inability to understand how other people are going to react to what they say. In Britain, Rumsfeld’s remarks caused a firestorm and were the lead story at the Times, the Telegraph, the Independent, and the Guardian ? and probably every other newspaper and television broadcast as well. A few hours later, after frantic transatlantic calls, Rumsfeld backtracked and said he had “no doubt” of the full support of Great Britain.
What a way to help the only ally you’ve got. Blair’s situation is already dicey enough, and Rumsfeld’s comments have potentially provided just the nudge needed to cause Blair to lose the support of his own party.
Every time one of these guys opens his mouth we lose another ally, and when this is all over it may turn out that their bungling in Turkey was the straw that finally broke the camel’s back. We lost the vote in Turkey by three votes, and this in turn probably demonstrated enough weakness to convince France and Russia to stand firm in their opposition to war. That in turn has sent Britain scrambling, and while we can surely prosecute the war on our own, the loss of both Turkey and Britain could delay the invasion long enough to allow even more opposition to develop. It’s still unlikely that anything will stop Bush from going to war, but at this point it’s at least possible.
And all because nobody in the administration can keep their damn mouths shut. It’s like watching a bunch of posturing teenagers in a schoolyard. Pathetic.
UPDATE: Bizarrely enough, Andrew Sullivan is on the same page as me. How likely is that?