GARY HART AT OXFORD….Gary Hart spoke at Oxford on Friday and Josh Chafetz was there. Conclusion: he’s pretty knowlegable, has a good sense of humor, but overall is a disappointment. Politicians usually use speeches like this to express their general principles, not provide white paper level detail, so I suspect Josh was hoping for a little too much from Hart, who made some arguments Josh doesn’t like and didn’t defend them adequately. Still, it’s an interesting firsthand look.
Josh puts the odds at a bit over 50% that Hart will run for president.
UPDATE: Jeralyn over at TalkLeft heard Hart’s speech too, and her opinion was quite a bit more positive.
PHOTO FUN….Reaction to my new photo has been, as they say in diplomatic circles, frank and candid. I’ll leave it up for a bit so everyone can giggle about it, and then put up a new one Monday night. And I’ll keep putting up new ones until I find one everybody likes.
I finally figured out how to use the self-timer on my camera on Saturday, and by God, I’m going to get my money’s worth from it….
MATT YGLESIAS HAS YOUR MARCHING ORDERS FOR YOU….Is it ANWR or is it the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge? Apparently it depends on whether you’re a liberal or a conservative.
SPACE FLIGHT AND BALLET….I just saw NASA administrator Sean O’Keefe on 60 Minutes tonight, and I have to give him a mixed review. At first he compared manned space flight to the early days of commercial aviation:
What was aviation like after its first 113 flights? How many crashes did they have? And yet today we have a thriving airline industry. And I think we’ll have the same thing in the future in space: people will go back and forth to space stations as easily as we fly to another city today.
(That’s an approximate quote. I was eating dinner, not taking notes.)
And he almost had me going. Yeah, it’s like the early days of aviation. Yeah!
Unfortunately, we’ve been flying humans into space for 40 years now, and space flight is nowhere near where commercial aviation was 40 years after the Wright brothers. Then, to make it worse, O’Keefe started talking about symphonies and ballets:
These are things that perhaps people think aren’t absolutely necessary, but we fund them anyway.
(Again very approximate quote.)
Unfortunately, most Americans just don’t have much interest in government funding of symphonies and ballets. For good or ill, this is not a great way to sell the American public on the idea of manned space flight.
I love the idea of manned space flight myself. If my income tax form had a box that allowed me to contribute an extra $100 to a government program to colonize space, I’d probably check it off. Unfortunately, though, I suspect the “symphonies and ballets” analogy is a pretty good one. And like the civic arts, manned space flight probably ought to be consigned primarily to the private sector, where it will be funded by enthusiasts and rich philanthropists. Maybe Bill Gates would contribute a couple billion dollars.