Itās long past demonstrated that Donald Trump is not in the normal range of aspiring political leaders, or even in the 95% interval. Heās a black swan, cruising around in unexplored regions of the possible, the part of the map that used to be marked with āhere be dragonsā. Still, itās worth reviewing in order of importance why itās unthinkable that he should be president; Iām surprised that his most despicable personal qualities end up at the bottom of the list.
(1) If nothing else in this list applied, he would be disqualified by his tin-pot dictator aspirations to subvert the most fundamental American principles, thinking he can just ānot acceptā the results of an election [yes, after recounts and appropriate procedural actions] and even toying with the idea that he would get to imprison his political opponents if he were to win. Trump is as close as weāve ever seen to the candidate running to be the last elected president.
(2) He is embedded in a uniquely opaque cloud of combined ignorance and insouciance. I canāt be sure which of his whoppers are just lying to hear himself talk, and which are genuine misinformation, because he believes nothing beyond his own ego, and knows nothing about anything; not economics, not defense, not the law, nothingā¦and I bet heās never read a whole book. What may be most important here is that he doesnāt care and wonāt do anything about it: his ignorance is practiced and purposeful.
(3) There should be an entry about here to the effect that the policies he would try to enact are bad ones, but because of (2), he doesnāt really have policies, just ideas that pop into his head when facing a crowd or a Twitter window.
(4) He surrounds himself with vicious, cynical, unmoored opportunists and haters, and he takes their advice (except advice to emulate a serious person) because heās too lazy (or perhaps too stupid) to do his own thinking, and completely, supinely, at the mercy of flattery. Good leaders try to accrete people better than they are; he goes around picking up parasites and barnacles.
(4) Heās cowardly, hateful, spiteful, racist, and just mean. Heās all these things especially toward anyone who exposes his deficiencies, either directly or by comparison, and to the weak and unfortunate. The roguesā gallery he would bring into government have binders and briefcases of nightmares to unleash.
(5) Heās personally corrupt, a con man and grifter whose entire business āsuccessā has been built on stiffing and cheating everyone he deals with: investors, lenders, suppliers, the government; everyone.
(6) Special case of (4): heās a lecherous, misogynistic swine about women, and totally OK being so. Never mind the policies he would enact, what would it be like to be on the White House staff? and imagine the endless opportunities for blackmail he will unreel. In a sane world, this personal quality would itself be disqualifying, and it has certainly taken up most of the air in the room as it has come to light. But on reflection, considering the risks he poses to everything that stands between us and a Mussoliniesque (or Putinesque) national ruin, I have to put this at the end of the list, which says something about what precedes it.
[Cross-posted at The Reality-Based Community]


