NO MISSION TO MARS?….Last Friday I commented on an LA Times article that said NASA was accelerating plans to build nuclear powered spacecraft, with the intention of using the technology for a manned mission to Mars.

Today in SpaceDaily Bruce Moomaw says the Times got the story wrong:

Brian Berger reports in “Space News” that an official who has seen NASA’s Fiscal Year 2004 budget request confirms that there will be a considerable expansion of the [nuclear propulsion] program: “There is significant money in the budget for Prometheus….more than I expected to see.”

However, this ? to put it mildly ? is not the same thing as saying that NASA plans to try to develop a very large nuclear rocket engine capable of launching a manned ship to Mars within a decade.

….[NASA Administrator Sean] O’Keefe has spent the past year talking constantly about his hopes for a deep space mission using nuclear-powered propulsion within a decade or so ? while making it clear that he is talking about an unmanned, relatively small probe. NASA’s Nuclear Electric Propulsion program ? for which it included $46.5 million in its FY 2003 budget request ? would have been just such a system.

He’s got more on other developments at NASA too. Just click on the link.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation