DRIVING ON THE LEFT….It’s Monday evening in London, so how are things going with the congestion charging experiment now that the school holidays are over and traffic is back up to its usual levels? Quite nicely, it turns out:

Opponents of the scheme were waiting to see if it would struggle to cope after a smooth first week of operation with the return of the school run on Monday. But traffic reports suggest vehicle numbers are up from last week but still 20% down on normal levels.

Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics has been the go-to site for congestion news, but there are no reports yet from today. Maybe Dan will have some personal commentary for us later.

On the other hand, yesterday he reported that the system is working so well that there’s already talk about the next step:

The system would charge motorists between 3p [$0.05] a mile on quiet roads to ?1.30 [$2.05] a mile in city centers. The system would work thus: “Cars will be fitted with tagging devices and their journeys followed by roadside detectors with a bill automatically dispensed to drivers.”

$2.05 a mile in city centers sounds a mite….steep, doesn’t it? I wonder if taxis would have to pay it too?

Anyway, now that the technology seems to be working pretty well ? to my surprise ? the next question is how well the congestion charge will work in the long run. These kinds of things frequently have a short term effect just out of shock value, but then traffic creeps back up and a year later it’s back to its old level. Then what? Just keep raising prices, I suppose.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation