Walk This Way

In seven geographically diverse states — Oregon, Montana, Washington, Pennsylvania, Kansas, North Dakota, and South Dakota — sizable access programs have been in place for roughly a decade and grown to include 500,000 or more acres. While the national number of hunters dropped by 7 percent between 1991 and 2001, in the same decade these seven states collectively saw the number of hunters in the field, resident and nonresident, rise by nearly 5 percent.

An analysis of U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service data below reveals that when one compares, to the extent possible, apples to apples, states with sizable access programs fare better at keeping hunters in the field than states with comparable rates of population growth, population density, and ratios of public to private land.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation