Options on the Table

OPTIONS ON THE TABLE….Joe Klein weighs in on whether “all options should be on the table”:

I thought, and still think “all/table” in response to an overt Iranian act of war against the United States. Processing nuclear fuel, even developing a bomb, doesn’t make the cut, although everything possible, short of war, should be done to discourage the latter.

Am I missing something here? I don’t think anyone is suggesting that a military attack should be off the table in response to a genuine, serious Iranian act of war. This entire discussion is about whether a military strike should be off the table as a way to keep Iran from getting nukes. This may not always be stated outright, but that’s because everyone already knows that’s what we’re talking about. The whole conversation is kind of silly otherwise.

Right?

Washington Monthly - Donate today and your gift will be doubled!

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation