Initial reaction: Obama wins on points

INITIAL REACTION: OBAMA WINS ON POINTS…. I’ll have a more thought out reaction to the debate in the morning, but my insta-reaction was that Obama had the edge, on points.

I think a lot of observers go into a debate like this waiting for a knock-out blow, along the lines of a “You’re no Jack Kennedy” moment. That almost never happens, and tonight certainly didn’t have any lasting, humiliating moments.

I was a little surprised at the contempt McCain showed for Obama, refusing to even look at Obama during the debate. It was the height of arrogance — McCain’s not-so-subtle message was that he didn’t even want to be on the same stage with his rival. I lost count of how many times he said Obama “doesn’t understand” an issue, even when it was obvious that it was McCain who was confused.

As for Obama, I continue to think about the 1980 analogy — Obama playing the role of Reagan, taking advantage of an electorate desperate for change, and clearing the credibility hurdle. Obama’s principal goal, I suspect, was to demonstrate his readiness, reassure skeptics, and prove that he belongs there. Reagan did it in ’80, and Obama did it tonight. As I watched, I kept thinking, “This guy is ready to lead.”

I never have any idea how “typical voters” will react to these events, but from where I sat, Obama looked very strong, demonstrating considerable foreign policy knowledge, an even temperament, and a striking intellect. McCain seemed defensive, angry, and even by his standards, he rambled quite a bit.

We’ll have more numbers soon enough, but Ambinder has this data from CBS News:

40% of uncommitted voters who watched the debate tonight thought Barack Obama was the winner. 22% thought John McCain won. 38% saw it as a draw.

68% of these voters think Obama would make the right decision about the economy. 41% think McCain would.

49% of these voters think Obama would make the right decisions about Iraq. 55% think McCain would.

Like I said, I’ll have more in the morning, but if I were giving letter grades, I’d say Obama deserves an A-, while McCain might get a generous B. How about you?

Washington Monthly - Donate today and your gift will be doubled!

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation

Steve Benen

Steve Benen is a producer at MSNBC's The Rachel Maddow Show. He was the principal contributor to the Washington Monthly's Political Animal blog from August 2008 until January 2012.