What a difference three months makes

WHAT A DIFFERENCE THREE MONTHS MAKES…. In October, about a month before Election Day, House Democrats scheduled a vote on S-CHIP, extending healthcare to low-income children. The point, obviously, was to pressure Republicans on a key issue at a key time. Who wants to take a stand against helping poor kids in the heat of an election season?

At the time, Rep. Thaddeus McCotter (R-Mich.), the chairman of the Republican House Policy Committee, wasn’t swayed.

If our Republican Party is daunted by the politics of S-CHIP and shrinks from reaffirming its defining principles, social welfare programs will never help poor Americans escape governmental dependence. Instead, the Democrats will continue their push to shackle Americans with a bureaucrat-centered health care system and other insidious forms of governmental dependence; and our Republican Party — the party of the Great Emancipator — will not only lose the next election.

It will lose its soul.

That was in October. Yesterday, McCotter voted for the exact same S-CHIP bill.

So, what happened? A month after writing that the Republican Party’s soul was on the line over S-CHIP, McCotter won a mere 51% of the vote against a Democrat that barely raised any money and who few had ever heard of.

I guess it’s the kind of thing that leads one to reevaluate insidious forms of governmental dependence.

Update: It’s been brought to my attention that McCotter’s blog post was written in October 2007, not October 2008. Oops. So, let’s make that, “What a difference 15 months makes….”

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation