GOP minority outreach takes another hit

GOP MINORITY OUTREACH TAKES ANOTHER HIT…. Once in a while, Republican Party officials will argue they’re sincere about reaching out to voters beyond their generally homogeneous base. And once in a while, we’re reminded why such outreach usually doesn’t go well.

Consider just the last few weeks. First we saw a GOP congressional candidate who published pieces for a racist publication, which criticized inter-racial marriage, school integration, Jews, and African Americans. Then we saw another ground of ugly anti-immigrant attack ads. This coincided with news of another GOP congressional candidate who spent years dressing up like a Nazi for recreation.

And yesterday, another high-profile Republican relied on old-fashioned gay bashing in the hopes of winning votes.

[New York’s] Republican candidate for governor, Carl P. Paladino, told a gathering in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, on Sunday that children should not be “brainwashed” into thinking that homosexuality was acceptable, and criticized his opponent, Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo, for marching in a gay pride parade earlier this year. […]

“I just think my children and your children would be much better off and much more successful getting married and raising a family, and I don’t want them brainwashed into thinking that homosexuality is an equally valid and successful option — it isn’t,” he said, reading from a prepared address, according to a video of the event.

And then, to applause at Congregation Shaarei Chaim, he said: “I didn’t march in the gay parade this year — the gay pride parade this year. My opponent did, and that’s not the example we should be showing our children.”

Amanda Terkel has the video.

Paladino’s prepared text reportedly included a sentence he chose not to include in spoken remarks: “There is nothing to be proud of in being a dysfunctional homosexual.”

By way of a defense, the Paladino campaign raised three points. The first is that the candidate did not actually repeat that offensive line in his prepared remarks. Of course, it’s not much of a response to argue, in effect, “We didn’t use that anti-gay rhetoric; we used different anti-gay rhetoric.”

Second, the campaign noted that Paladino hired a gay person for his campaign staff, but once we get into “some of my best friends are [fill in the blank with minority group]” the discussion is over.

And third, the Paladino campaign argued that a “majority of New Yorkers agree with” his anti-gay attitudes. I rather doubt that’s true, but no matter what the polls say, bigotry need not be subjected to a popularity contest.

What’s more, I’d be remiss if I didn’t note the irony of Paladino saying, “I just think my children and your children would be much better off and much more successful getting married and raising a family.” In Paladino’s case, that should probably be rephrased to say “better off and much more successful getting married, committing adultery, and raising children from both my wife and my mistress.”

The anti-gay ugliness is offensive enough, but where does this guy get off pretending to have the moral high ground on family values?

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation