Simple Answers to Stupid Questions: Zionism Department

Sometimes it’s easy to overthink things. Andrew Sullivan asks:

My own view is that the interests of the US require pressuring Israel to agree to a reasonable two-state solution soon. Maybe I’m wrong. But could a Jewish person convinced of the same argument remain a Jew in good standing?

Yes. Next question?

Is a commitment to Zionism in defense of Greater Israel a disqualifier from being part of the Jewish people?

No, but it is a disqualifier from being intelligent.

Andrew’s own position is evolving, so maybe they are harder for him. But for those of us who follow the issue, this really isn’t that hard. I confess to being continually surprised by essays on both sides lauded by their supporters as “courageous,” which say absolutely nothing new.

Geuninely new and interesting ideas, such as Sari Nusseibeh’s inspired suggestion for having both peoples vote on an American proposal, get no traction because they shift the paradigm and so cannot be understood. So we just rehash the old arguments, watch Zionism self-destruct, and return to Yavneh.

[Cross-posted at The Reality-Based Community]

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation

Jonathan Zasloff

Jonathan Zasloff is a professor of law at the University of California, Los Angeles.