My Only Conclusion About the London Riots

I have been trading worried emails with London friends all week, and trying to think of something to post here about the violence.

I knew not to say, as many have, that it had to do with the coalition government’s cuts in services, because those cuts haven’t started yet.

I was going to say it had to do with typical young male behavior and lack of meaningful roles and socializing forces for them, but then I learned that many rioters were female.

I was going to say it showed how angry Britain’s African-descended community feels at the white majority, but then I learned that the rioters were from multiple races and ethnicities, as were the victims.

I was going to say it was just about poverty, and then I learned that many of the looters were working class, middle class, even upper class.

In the end, the only thing I know for sure is that if this had happened in the states, there would have been hundreds of more deaths because everyone would have been firing guns at everyone else.

[Cross-posted at The Reality-Based Community]

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation

Keith Humphreys

Keith Humphreys is a professor of psychiatry at Stanford University. He served as a senior policy advisor at the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy from 2009 to 2010.