The far-right arbiters of racial identity

Far-right media personality Laura Ingraham made a curious argument about Herman Cain on her radio show yesterday.

“Well I have a question. Herman Cain, if he became president, he would be the first black president, when you measure it by — because he doesn’t — does he have a white mother, white father, grandparents, no, right? So Herman Cain, he could say that he’s — he’s — he’s the first, uh — he could make the claim to be the first — yeah, the first Main Street black Republican to be the president of the United States. Right? He’s historic too.”

Laura Ingraham has “a question”? Well, I have an answer.

Stop trying to be the arbiter as to who is and isn’t black.

Stop trying to draw a distinction between African Americans who meet an unstated standard for “Main Street black” — whatever that’s supposed to mean — and whatever the alternative might be.

Stop trying to say President Obama isn’t really black because of his white mother.

I mean, really. What possible point could the right have for pursuing this? Why on earth would right-wing, white media personalities feel comfortable designating themselves as the best arbiters of Americans’ racial identity?

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation