Stock photography is not your friend

A long time ago, I wrote direct mail for a campaign consulting firm, and it wasn’t unusual to use stock photography in various mailings.

If, for example, the firm was going to criticize Representative So-and-so for cutting education, the piece would use a picture of a sad kid — and it didn’t matter if the mailing was going to voters in Portland, Oregon, and Portland, Maine, at the same time. For one thing, the voters wouldn’t know. For another, a sad kid looks like a sad kid everywhere.

But that was 15 years ago, when the Internet was in its infancy and it was tougher to check these things. These days, candidates have to realize that using stock photos is inviting trouble.

Just as Rep. Denny Rehberg (R), running for the Senate in Montana, who used a nice photo of “Montana’s seniors” in a taxpayer-financed mailing who aren’t from Montana.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation