Racial Polarization and the Challenge to the Voting Rights Act

There can be no doubt that the covered jurisdictions differ, as a group, from the noncovered jurisdictions in their rates of  racially polarized voting. There can also be no doubt that voting the covered jurisdictions is becoming more, not less, polarized over time.

From a new paper by Nathaniel Persily, Charles Stewart, and Stephen Ansolabehere.  It is obviously relevant given today’s arguments before the Court which, at first blush, suggest that a majority is skeptical of this aspect of the VRA.  For example, John Roberts asked:

Is it the government’s submission that the citizens in the South are more racist than the citizens in the North?

Well, there is this:

General Social Survey and National Election Studies data from the 1970s to the present indicate that whites residing in the old Confederacy continue to display more racial antagonism and ideological conservatism than non-Southern whites. Racial conservatism has become linked more closely to presidential voting and party identification over time in the white South, while its impact has remained constant elsewhere. This stronger association between racial antagonism and partisanship in the South compared to other regions cannot be explained by regional differences in nonracial ideology or nonracial policy preferences, or by the effects of those variables on partisanship.

[Originally posted at The Monkey Cage]

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation

John Sides

John Sides is an associate professor of political science at George Washington University.