College offers are in and so admissions staff are now apparently willing to give feedback about the essays students submitted in their applications.
They hated them:
This is the second year in a row college admissions officers have told me that application essays, as a group, were pretty disappointing. They use phrases like “they’re writing too safe” and “we appreciate the effort,” but what they mean is clear; they were given celery when they were looking for steak. Yes, there were exceptions — like the rep who told one of my students his essay was so wonderful, it brought him to tears — but as a rule, there’s room for improvement for next year’s class.
Isn’t this always true?
Is one’s college application really the time to take “big risks” and go for really bold, and potentially controversial, admissions essays? Say that one you really wanted to write about how heroin legalization would be awesome or Western civilization’s prohibition against incest is too restrictive? Maybe the college application is a good time write a piece in iambic pentameter; that will really get their attention.
All of these things are really, really bad ideas. The college application is a very good to play it safe, boring as this must be for admissions staff.
One thing I’ve always wondered about this, though, is how admissions staff really see the essay. After 5 or so years doesn’t all of the writing sort of look the same? The admissions essay must seem especially underwhelming if the people making the decision routinely read nonfiction written and edited by real adult writers.
But to a professional who’s worked in admissions for several years, don’t the essays start to seem a little silly? I remember when I was 17 or so the essay seemed like a very big deal. That was time for me to prove I was so smart that the college couldn’t possibly turn me down. This now strikes me as pretty arrogant and delusional. How often is someone in admissions blown away by a 500-word piece someone in high school writes?