Andropov or Gorbachev?

The wave of optimism coming out of Iran after Hassan Rowhani’s landslide victory in a tightly controlled presidential election is both heartening and understandable. The consolidation of reform-oriented voters behind the candidacy of the least of available evils sends a pretty unmistakable signal for the direction popular sentiment supports, and it’s hard to imagine Rowhani not being an improvement over the feckless demagogue Mahmoud Amadinejad, who is apparently in danger of facing criminal changes even before he leaves office in August.

But while restive Iranians tired of economic calamity and international brinkmanship are entitled to feel very good about this turn of events, outsiders should beware the natural tendency to misinterpret an authoritarian regime’s change of tactics for an impending revolution. Remember Yuri Andropov, the successor to Brezhnev whose ascension to the leadership of the Kremlin briefly and prematurely fed hopes of major changes in the USSR because of the former KGB chief’s alleged taste for Scotch whisky and other accoutrements of Western culture?

When the real deal came along a few years later, some observers were skeptical that Mikhail Gorbachev represented anything other than another false spring in the Kremlin. While Iran is a very different beast from the USSR in its declining years, it requires of westerners a similar suspension of easy analogies. Given Iran’s heavy influence on U.S. policy in the Greater Middle East, particularly now that President Obama has called for more significant intervention in the Syrian civil war against Iran’s friend Bashar al-Assad, keeping Rowhani real–not a symbol of this or that, or a cartoon character, or an object of wish fulfillment–will be important.

Washington Monthly - Donate Today and your gift will be doubled!

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation

Ed Kilgore

Ed Kilgore is a political columnist for New York and managing editor at the Democratic Strategist website. He was a contributing writer at the Washington Monthly from January 2012 until November 2015, and was the principal contributor to the Political Animal blog.