With the Filibuster Gone, Time for a Confirmation-palooza!

The only regret I had about the filibuster going down yesterday is that it didn’t happen in 2009, when it really could have done some good. Better late than never though, and now that the way has been made straight for a much easier confirmation process, the Democrats should get to work. They might lose the Senate in 2014, and there’s no time to waste.

First up, the federal judiciary. Apart from the three empty seats on the DC Circuit Court, there are ninety other empty seats on the federal bench. President Obama has had fewer judges confirmed than either Bush or Clinton, and the vacancy rate is far higher than it has been:

Second, the executive branch. Most obviously, empty posts should be filled. As of February, there were 68 unfilled positions needing Senate approval. I imagine that has diminished somewhat since then, but there are certainly still dozens sitting empty. However, this can also be a time for turnover. If someone needs to be fired or wants to leave, now is the time to make a break for it while a replacement can be confirmed easily.

Finally, the nomination process needs to be dramatically streamlined. This is partially due to senators submitting hundreds of largely frivolous questions, which could be sharply limited under the new Senate rules. A few dozen questions total and a couple hours’ worth of confirmation hearing would be more than enough.

But probably the most important factor is the White House’s insanely meticulous vetting. We shouldn’t be nominating criminals, of course, but there’s no reason on earth that it should take more than a couple days to look over somebody’s background. There would be a slightly increased chance of a minor scandal, but that is far, far outweighed by the reality of an executive branch rendered ineffective due to lack of staff strength.

I know President Obama prides himself on running a clean executive branch, but right now his legacy depends on executive action. Time to start batch-processing these nominations.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation

Ryan Cooper

Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at the Week. His work has appeared in the Washington Post, the New Republic, and the Nation. He was an editor at the Washington Monthly from 2012 to 2014.