E-Cigarettes, Snus and The Impact of Tobacco: It’s Complicated

The debate about whether e-cigarettes are a net positive or negative for public health is becoming ideological at what I find an alarming rate. Before everyone gets too entrenched in their views, it might help to look at what has been learned about an older form of putatively safer tobacco, which was subject to the same questions as e-cigarettes are now: snus. I describe that evidence today at Stanford Medical School’s blog.

Personally, I was a strong snus advocate based on the Swedish research, but have become more reserved (though still on balance positive) since subsequent evidence complicated the picture. I have similarly mixed feelings about e-cigarettes, and I doubt that will change until we have better data, especially regarding what happens over time as the culture absorbs and adapts to this new technology.

[Cross-posted at The Reality-Based Community]

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation

Keith Humphreys

Keith Humphreys is a professor of psychiatry at Stanford University. He served as a senior policy advisor at the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy from 2009 to 2010.