D.C. Circuit Panel’s Halbig Decision Goes “Poof!”

In breaking news this morning, the full D.C. Court of Appeals vacated a three-judge panel’s earlier decision in the Halbig case challenging the statutory authorization for health insurance subsidies for policies purchased on Obamacare’s federal exchanges, and agreed to hear the case en banc, which means the whole Court.

That massively increases the likelihood that the D.C. Circuit will reach a different conclusion in the case. And perhaps just as importantly, it eliminates for the time being the argument that the Supreme Court needs to step in to resolve crucial disagreements between different circuits (the 4th Circuit dismissed a similar suit).

As ThinkProgress’ Ian Millhiser notes, conservatives can be expected argue that the unusual nature of the full D.C. circuit’s intervention in the case justifies Supreme Court review even if the inter-circuit disagreement rationale goes away. So the bottom line may actually come down to how badly the Supremes do–or don’t–want this case.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation

Ed Kilgore

Ed Kilgore, a Monthly contributing editor, is a columnist for the Daily Intelligencer, New York magazine’s politics blog, and the managing editor for the Democratic Strategist.