Clinton Charter Critique Faulted By FactCheck

It seemed to take a while for mainstream news outlets to catch up to the charter school critique issued by Hillary Clinton a week or so ago, but advocates and then editorial pages pummeled her broad-brush comments all last week and through the weekend.

On Thursday took issue with it as well:

“We take no position on the merits of charter schools. But we find that Clinton’s broad claim that “most charter schools” don’t accept or don’t keep the hardest-to-teach kids is not supported by the evidence.”

Fact-checking is a tough thing for newsrooms to do on the fly, but is something that is possible to do when claims are questioned. In a perfect world, claims made by candidates or advocates would be questioned and verified as they are being reported — not just by quoting reactions from opponents. At least in this situation an attempt was made to look into them after the fact. 

Related posts: Trying To Understand Coverage Of Clinton’s Charter School CritiqueTransparency On Fact-Checking Might Shed Light On Controversial NYT Oped.

Washington Monthly - Donate today and your gift will be doubled!

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation

Alexander Russo

Alexander Russo is a freelance education writer who has created several long-running blogs such as the national news site This Week In Education, District 299 (about Chicago schools), and LA School Report. He can be reached on Twitter at @alexanderrusso, on Facebook, or directly at