In 1974, Jon Landau famously declared, āI saw rock and roll future and its name is Bruce Springsteen.ā Earlier today, I saw the future of political lying, and its name is Kellyanne Conway.
Conwayās performance on CNNās Reliable Sources has to be seen to be disbelieved. It was 20 minutes of BS bravura, a disturbing, sickening, yet fascinating combination of explicit falsehoods, near-fanatical hero worship, nasty insults and off-the-scale egomania. It was like watching a horror movie with no blood, no screaming, no gratuitous violence, yet one thatās scarier than any slasher flick.
Iām not a religious person, but as I watched Conwayās hate-filled responses to Brian Stelterās questions, I had the image of a person who, upon death, was offered a chance to pick heaven or hell and eagerly volunteered for hell on the grounds that it would be a far more interesting experience. Conway seems to believe that Donald Trump can literally do no wrong, is not remotely responsible for anything negative going on in this countryāand is the ultimate victim of discrimination.
The paranoia of Conwayās vision is immeasurable in its depth. Nixon wasnāt this paranoid. Conway is convinced that Trump is under siege by the mainstream media, by Democrats, by Clinton loyalists. She probably thinks the Illuminati, the Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission are coming after him, too.
Stelter tried the best he could to knock down Conwayās piled-up prevarications, but he was overmatched. Conway is simply too good of a liar. Frighteningly, if this were considered a debate, Conway would be declared the winner, because she came across as more forceful and confident than Stelterāeven though Stelter was the one telling the truth.
āThe goal [of the press] is not to get the President,ā Stelter declared at one point. āThe goal is to get the truth. Thereās a lot of people lying, and trying to obscure the truth.ā Sadly, they seem to be doing a damn good job of itāand their skill at obscuring the truth is the greatest threat to our democracy.
Thanks to the likes of Conway, Trump could well survive the Mueller investigation. It can be argued that Nixon didnāt survive Watergate because he didnāt have propagandists good enough to overwhelm the mainstream press with the power of their spin. Thatās not a problem Trump has. Conway, Sean Hannity and the other Trumpistas inside and outside of his administration are the 82nd Airborne of acerbic amorality.
Conway declared this morning that Trump is āhappy to send meā onto outlets such as CNN to preach his grotesque gospel. If I were Trump, Iād be happy to send Conway as well; if you want someone who defend your lies, get someone whoās great at it. Conway is to lying what Katharine Hepburn was to acting.
Towards the end of the interview, Stelter asked Conway if sheāll be proud of defending Trump a decade or two from now. Of course she will. āZealotryā isnāt a strong enough word to describe her pro-Trump fervor; the best description I can give is that it was reminiscent of Dennis Hopper in Apocalypse Now.
What I wouldnāt give to see footage of Stelter off-air once that segment ended. Was he stunned by the sheer magnitude of Conwayās chicanery? Did he question the ability of the Fourth Estate to ensure that facts prevailed over falsehoods? Did he wonder whether CNN should continue providing a forum to those who are talented at twisting the truth? And if so, how did he answer that question in his mind?


