What Led to Trump’s Rose Garden Temper Tantrum?

Trump was scheduled to meet with Democratic leaders at the White House on Wednesday morning to continue their discussion about infrastructure. Just prior to the meeting, Speaker Nancy Pelosi met with her caucus and made this statement to the press about their discussion.

When Democratic leaders arrived at the White House, Trump walked into the room, went on a five-minute rant about ongoing investigations, and then walked out. He proceeded to the Rose Garden where he held a supposedly impromptu press conference, refusing to govern until Democrats stopped their investigations. They claim that it was Pelosi’s remarks about a cover-up that triggered it all.

But take a look at the lectern from which the president made his remarks in the Rose Garden.

It was decked out with statements about the amount of time and money spent on the Mueller investigation, only to find “no collusion” and “no obstruction.” There were fact sheets prepared with the same information handed out to reporters. Does that look like an impromptu response to Pelosi’s remarks? Not likely.

So what led Trump to announce that he would refuse to govern until Democrats stopped their investigations? Here is Schumer’s explanation.

That fits with my assumption that Democrats entered these discussions about infrastructure knowing that Trump would either back out or fail to rally his own party around the issue. Whenever Trump fails, his response is to lie, deflect, and blame. Because he was failing on infrastructure, he decided to blame the investigations being carried out by Democrats.

But David Frum has another thought about what prompted this particular temper tantrum.

Judge Amit Mehta so thoroughly destroyed the arguments dreamt up by Trump’s lawyers to obstruct these investigations that they are beginning to realize that they are going to lose these cases in court. Trump’s tantrum is his way of threatening them to back off.

It is possible that both Schumer and Frum are right. One explanation doesn’t necessarily preclude the other. But leave it up to Speaker Pelosi to stick the knife in where it really hurts.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works —and how to make it work better. More than fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.