How the Democratic Debates Changed the Primary

Most analysis of the first Democratic debate will focus on polls that either ask who “won” the debate, or compare the current percentage of support for a candidate to their previous standing. But given the fact that most Democratic primary voters are still considering several candidates, that kind of analysis will miss how the debate impacted their thinking.

To understand how all of the candidates were either helped or hurt by their debate performance, FiveThirtyEight teamed up with Morning Consult to compare their net favorability ratings (favorable minus unfavorable) before and after the debate. Here’s what they found.

HuffPost and YouGov found similar results when they asked Democratic voters whether their view of each candidate improved or worsened after watching the debates.

Both charts indicate that the candidates who improved their positioning the most are Warren, Harris, Booker, and Castro. In terms of the two leaders going into the debate, Biden seems to have lost ground and Sanders held steady.

Prior to the debate, here is how the race looked:

Top Tier

Second Tier

Zeroing in on the post-debate net favorability ratings from FiveThirtyEight, the top tier of candidates has now expanded to four, with Harris joining Biden, Sanders, and Warren. The second tier now consists of Booker, Buttigieg, and Castro. Unless O’Rourke, Klobuchar, or Gillibrand can conjure up a major surprise in the next few weeks to salvage their candidacies, they’re probably done—as is the rest of the field.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works —and how to make it work better. More than fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.