Plenty. They improperly expand presidential power and will make it harder to vote.
Joshua A. Douglas
Joshua A. Douglas is a law professor at the University of Kentucky J. David Rosenberg College of Law. He is the author of The Court v. The Voters: The Troubling Story of How the Supreme Court Has Undermined Voting Rights. He is currently working on a new project on voter turnout and nonvoters. He is also the host of the award-winning Democracy Optimist podcast. Find him at www.joshuaadouglas.com.
I’m a Law School Professor. Here’s What Keeps Me Up at Night
Doomscrolling scenarios like a Trump third term won’t happen. But what if this administration defies court orders?
Trump Has Little Power to Make Drastic Voting Changes
Our decentralized system of elections will likely prevent the incoming president from achieving his goals. Here’s why.
What I’m Watching on Election Night
All eyes are on the presidential and statewide races, but a voting rights scholar is watching these critical ballot initiatives for a sense of where democracy and voting rights are heading. You should, too.
On Voting Rights, Trump and Harris Couldn’t Be Farther Apart
Harris would expand early voting and vote-by-mail, discourage partisan gerrymandering, and adopt policies leading to higher turnout. Trump’s obsession with election “integrity” is narrow, used most often to challenge results he does not like.
Do You Have Questions About When and Where to Vote, Candidates and Issues Up and Down the Ballot? We’ve Got You Covered.
A voting rights expert discusses the best guides to smooth your final choices.
Noncitizens Are Not Voting in Massive Numbers
Don’t believe the hype: Federal law prohibits them from voting, and there’s no evidence that they’re doing so in any numbers that could sway elections.
The Continuing War on Easier Access to Voting
In statehouses and courthouses, enemies of easier access to voting are working overtime to challenge expanded voter registration.
The Supreme Court’s Naked Power Grab
This past term, from Trump immunity to voting rights, the conservative supermajority ignored restraint and gave itself untoward authority.
Today’s Supreme Court is Anti-Voter
The South Carolina redistricting ruling is more evidence of a Court that guts voting rights and defers to politicians and not citizens.

