Posted inEducation, Higher Education

A Note on Methodology – 2006

W e settled on two primary goals in our methodology. First, we considered no single category to be more important than any other. Second, the final rankings needed to reflect excellence across the full breadth of our measures, rather than reward an exceptionally high focus on, say, research. All categories were weighted equally when calculating […]

Posted inEducation, Higher Education

The Washington Monthly College Rankings – National Universities – 2006

1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MA) 7 2. University of California, Berkeley* (CA) 20 3. Pennsylvania State University, University Park* (PA) 48 4. University of California, Los Angeles* (CA) 25 5. Texas A&M University* (TX) 60 6. University of California, San Diego* (CA) 32 7. Stanford University (CA) 5 8. Cornell University (NY) 13 9. […]

Posted inEducation, Higher Education

A Note on Methodology – 2005

E ach of our three categories included several components. We determined the Community Service score by measuring each school’s performance in three different areas: the percentage of their students enrolled in the Army or Navy Reserve Officer Training Corps; the percentage of their students who are currently serving in the Peace Corps; and the percentage […]

Posted inEducation, Higher Education

The Washington Monthly College Guide – Other guides ask what colleges can do for you. We ask what are colleges doing for the country – 2005

T his month, U.S. News & World Report releases its annual rankings of colleges. First published in 1983, the guide has become its own mini-event: College presidents, education reporters, alumni, parents, and high school juniors alike all scramble to get their hands on the rankings. Its release is followed by weeks of gloating from the […]

Gift this article