The government program where party differences have widened the most, and matter the most, is Medicaid.
Conservatives love to apply “cost-benefit analysis” to government programs—except in health care. In fact, working with drug companies and warning of “death panels,” they slipped language into Obamacare banning cost-effectiveness research. Here’s how that happened, and why it can’t stand.
Preventing mass killings like the one in Newtown may be impossible. But there’s plenty we can do to reduce violence by the mentally ill in general. And the tools are right there in Obamacare.
In 2002, the Institute of Medicine published an oft-cited and controversial report entitled Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. The report concluded that members of minority groups, even when fully insured, tend to receive substandard care from their doctors. It cited disparities in how often whites and minorities received even routine… Read more »
How disaster relief justifies the welfare state.
An innovative foster care program for disabled vets points the way to solving two of the nation’s greatest challenges at the same time.
A job creation idea so obviously good even Washington couldn’t possibly say no… could it?
The politics of debt have gotten so insane that both parties are on the verge of gutting Medicare. The moment might be right to actually fix it.
How America’s forbidding political landscape made health care reform impossible for Clinton and nearly so for Obama.