Conservatives cheered the Court overturning the 40-year-old reasonable standard of deference to agencies. But other rulings may do more to hamstring both elected branches of government while aggrandizing the role of judges.
Chevron Doctrine
Posted inLaw and Justice
The Supreme Court’s Naked Power Grab
This past term, from Trump immunity to voting rights, the conservative supermajority ignored restraint and gave itself untoward authority.
Posted inLaw and Justice
This Horrible Supreme Court Term
This horrible supreme court term: Kneecapping the administrative state, making bribery great again, immunizing presidents, and legislating from the bench—the justices really earned their motorcoach and fishing vacations.
Posted inLaw and Justice
As the Supreme Court Reconsiders “Chevron Deference,” Will Its Ruling Be Monumental or “Meh”?
Last month, the Supreme Court heard two cases—Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. Department of Commerce—each widely anticipated because the Court’s ruling on them could significantly reshape the federal judiciary’s relationship to the federal administrative bureaucracy. The issue in both is whether the Court should overrule, or at least narrow, a 40-year-old […]
Posted inLaw and Justice
The Next Regulatory Disaster? The Supreme Court Takes Up the “Chevron Doctrine.”
For almost 40 years, it’s been a key test for judges weighing federal regulations. Will the Court’s conservative supermajority show modesty?
