The Unemployment Paradox, Part 2

THE UNEMPLOYMENT PARADOX, PART 2….More on the unemployment paradox. Over at Economists for Dean, Lerxst picks up on a New York Times op-ed that says applications for disability payments skyrocketed by more than a million between 1999 and 2003 after staying stable for several years before. If those people were counted as unemployed, the unemployment rate would have peaked at around 8%.

There’s more there if you want to read the whole argument. The authors aren’t arguing that these people don’t deserve payments, just that in the past they would have been counted as unemployed and now they’re not. The unemployment rate looks lower but it’s just a statistical artifact.

The interesting tidbits just keep piling up, don’t they?

Washington Monthly - Donate today and your gift will be doubled!

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation