Universal Video Surveillance?

UNIVERSAL VIDEO SURVEILLANCE?….Eugene Volokh points out that a court has upheld a law in my hometown of Garden Grove that requires video surveillance of all cybercafes. It is, he says, “not a doctrinally easy case.”

The proximate cause was gang problems at cybercafes ? which really is a problem in Garden Grove these days ? but count me as being on the skeptical side anyway. Requiring uniformed security guards or other appropriate security measures is something I can live with. Voluntarily installing video cameras is also OK. But requiring video surveillance is rather more disturbing, especially at a place that is practically a shrine to the right of free speech.

Is universal surveillance inevitable? Maybe. But I don’t think we should go down without a fight.

UPDATE: By the way, a good rule of thumb with things like this is to ask yourself this question: would you trust, say, Richard Nixon or J. Edgar Hoover with this law? If the answer is no, you should think pretty hard about whether it’s a good idea.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation