CLARKE CORROBORATION….Is Clarke right that the Bush administration’s first instinct after 9/11 was to attack Iraq, not Afghanistan? Katherine R at Obsidian Wings, on hiatus from her hiatus (translation: yes, I’m addicted to blogging after all), reminds us that Clarke isn’t the only one who’s told this story. Britain’s ambassador to Washington said the same thing over a year ago.

Details here.

UPDATE: But why were so many people in the Bush administration convinced that Iraq was behind 9/11? As Peter Bergen asked in a Washington Monthly article a few months ago, “Where did this faith come from?”

Luckily, as Matt Yglesias reminds us, Peter Bergen also answered the question in that same article. It’s a pretty interesting answer, too.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Tim Dunlop has excerpts from The Age of Sacred Terror that provide more background on Clarke, terrorism, counterterrorism, and Iraq. It’s here, here, and here.

Independent since 1969.

The Washington Monthly is nonprofit and reader-supported. Your tax-deductible gift pays for the reporting you just read.