Pledge of Allegiance

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE….I see that the Supreme Court punted today in the Pledge of Allegiance case. Three justices said “under God” was no big deal (and Antonin Scalia surely would have joined them if he hadn’t recused himself), but the rest of the court weaseled out by deciding that Michael Newdow had no standing to bring the case on behalf of his daughter because he doesn’t have custody:

When hard questions of domestic relations are sure to affect the outcome, a prudent course is for the federal court to stay its hand rather than reach out to resolve a weighty question of federal constitutional law.

Bah. What a bunch of cowards. If they had any guts they would have approved the wording of the pledge but insisted on a firm rotation of “under God,” “under Allah,” “under Jehovah,” and a few other choices that escape me at the moment. That would liven up the campaign season, wouldn’t it?

Washington Monthly - Donate today and your gift will be doubled!

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation