More Free Advice!

MORE FREE ADVICE!….Mark Schmitt has a good critique of my suggestion from a few days ago that Democrats can’t beat Bush by banging on a theme of incompetence. Since Mark is a lot smarter about this kind of stuff than me, it’s worth reading.

Perhaps foolishly, though, I don’t think I’m ready to back down. It’s not that I don’t think Bush is incompetent, it’s just that I don’t think the folly of his policies is yet clear enough that you can convince people of it. In a couple of years, when the smoke clears, it will be pretty easy, but for now I think competence arguments rely too heavily on technical policy grounds that don’t have much resonance with voters.

Needless to say, though, a competence argument is still part of the package, and we may mostly be arguing about emphasis. Should it be the main argument against Bush or should it be a background theme? I still vote for the latter.

Of course, there’s also the bigger question of what to talk about: national security or domestic issues? I think this is really the core question, and I’m appalled at the advice of Democratic bigwigs that Kerry should focus on domestic issues. Fundamentally, I think this election is all about national security. It’s about convincing people that Bush’s vision is dangerous and misguided and that Kerry can do a better job of protecting the country. More on this later if I can get my thoughts in order.

Washington Monthly - Donate today and your gift will be doubled!

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation