Democracy Wrapup

DEMOCRACY WRAPUP….Many thanks to Dan Drezner and Marc (Abu Aardvark) Lynch for the guest blogging this week. I hope everyone enjoys occasional multiparty conversations here on the blog, since I plan to experiment with more of it in the future. Constructive comments on how you liked or didn’t like it are welcome.

I forgot to do this last time I invited some guests, but here’s a wrapup of the entire series of posts:

  1. Kevin: Liberals shouldn’t be afraid to be idealistic about liberty and democracy.

  2. Dan: Bush deserves credit for staying the course on democracy promotion.

  3. Marc: Does he? The war affected the chances of democracy, but other things mattered more.

  4. Kevin: Maybe we’ll end up with democracy in Iraq, maybe we won’t, but it sure wasn’t the original plan.

  5. Marc: Bush talks the democracy talk, but he doesn’t walk the democracy walk.

  6. Dan: Joe Biden thinks NGOs are great, but guess what? They can create problems as well as solve them.

  7. Marc: Yep, NGOs are no panacea.

  8. Kevin: Look guys, let’s get down to cases: did the war help spread democracy or didn’t it?

  9. Marc: No, it didn’t. It probably hurt more than it helped.

  10. Dan: Yes it did. Having al-Jazeera broadcast the sight of Iraqis braving car bombs to vote was a powerful signal to the whole region.

  11. Kevin: (Just an aside: Trade unions could have helped the democratic process along if Bush had been willing to work with them.)

  12. Marc: Dan is wrong: there were plenty of other options besides war for promoting democracy in the Middle East.

  13. Kevin: You know, maybe the war caused the recent oubreaks of democracy, maybe it didn’t. But it is affecting the way they evolve. Is anyone thinking hard about that?

  14. Marc: What do we do if radical anti-American Islamists win free and fair elections?

  15. Dan: If the radicals win, let ’em give governing a try. Things will probably turn out OK.

Washington Monthly - Donate today and your gift will be doubled!

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation