Life and Death

LIFE AND DEATH….On Thursday the Supreme Court heard the case of Paul House, a Tennessee man who is appealing his death sentence based on new DNA evidence suggesting he’s innocent. Antonin Scalia indicated during the arguments that he wanted to take a very strict, legalistic approach to the case, and Cathy Young isn’t impressed:

So the difference between a man’s life and death hinges on the difference between “could” and “would.” It sounds like something out of a very black comedy satirizing the courts.

The convenience of the criminal justice system really shouldn’t be the primary factor in deciding whether someone lives or dies. House deserves a new trial.

Washington Monthly - Donate today and your gift will be doubled!

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation