Strategic Appetite

STRATEGIC APPETITE….Is the Pentagon’s budget too stingy?

For more than a year, Gen. Peter J. Schoomaker, the outgoing Army chief of staff, has pointed out that defense spending accounts for about 3.8% of the gross domestic product….Navy Adm. Michael G. Mullen added: “At 3.8%, it just isn’t enough for the strategic appetite, and the strategic appetite is tied directly to the world we’re living in.”

Of course, that isn’t true. Here’s what’s in the FY2008 budget:

In fiscal 2008, beginning Oct. 1, the administration is requesting $481.4 billion for the Pentagon, an increase of $49 billion or 11.3%, that doesn’t count two additional requests for Iraq and the larger global war against terrorism. When these are included, the president is asking for a total of $716.5 billion to carry the military through Sept. 30, 2008.

That’s about 4.9% of GDP. Add in other items that are routinely left out of the “Pentagon” budget even though they’re clearly part of our overall defense expenditures and you get a number well over 5% of GDP. Seems like a pretty fair chunk of change, doesn’t it? Though, no doubt, still not enough to sate the Pentagon’s “strategic appetite.” But what is?

Washington Monthly - Donate today and your gift will be doubled!

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation