Four Wars

FOUR WARS….In Slate, Phil Carter writes that our problem in Iraq is that we’re not fighting either a civil war or a counterinsurgency or an anti-terrorist campaign. We’re fighting all of them at once. In fact, there are four separate wars:

  1. Shi’a on Shi’a, principally in the south. Requires delicate political maneuvering. Military action would “undermine the goal of building a legitimate and stable government for Iraq.”

  2. Sectarian conflict, principally in Baghdad. Requires a “massive imposition of force and control.”

  3. The insurgency. Requires a traditional counterinsurgency approach. Unfortunately, the training of indigenous troops, the obvious first step, “has merely trained and equipped the partisans fighting Iraq’s sectarian civil war.”

  4. Al-Qaeda. Plays the role of spoiler anytime it looks like the other three wars might be flagging.

Phil doesn’t say it, but the conclusion from this is pretty obvious: continued American engagement is futile. No matter what tactics we use, at best we can win only one of these battles — and only at the cost of making the others worse. Read the whole thing.

Washington Monthly - Donate today and your gift will be doubled!

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation