Cui Bono?

CUI BONO?….According to Dani Rodrik, a study by Bradford, Grieco, and Hufbauer suggests that removing all remaining barriers to trade would raise U.S. incomes anywhere from $4,000 to $12,000 per household. Wow! Let’s do it! I could use the extra money. But then Rodrik hauls out the heavy artillery:

First a reality check. The standard partial equilibrium formula for calculating the gains from moving to free trade is 0.5 x [t/(1+t)]^2 x m x e, where t is the tariff rate, m is the share of imports in GDP, and e is the (absolute value of the price elasticity of import demand). In the U.S. average tariffs stand in low single digits and imports are less than 20% of GDP. There is no way of tweaking this formula under reasonable elasticities that would get us a number anywhere near the Bradford et al. estimates. For example, using the generous numbers t = 0.10, m = 0.2 and e = 3, the gains from moving to complete free trade are a meager 0.25% of GDP (compared to Bradford et al.’s lowest estimate of 3.4% of GDP).

Damn. There’s a formula for calculating the gains from free trade? (A relatively simple one, too. I’m impressed. I always figured this stuff was done with rocket science computer models.) And even when you plug in generous variables it produces a gain of only 300 bucks per household? Hmmph.

Of course, 300 bucks a family still amounts to $30 billion or so. Divide that among a thousand super-rich families and that’s $30 million each. It doesn’t sound so bad when you put it that way, does it?

Via Mark Thoma.

Washington Monthly - Donate today and your gift will be doubled!

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation