Targeting Obama’s half-brother

TARGETING OBAMA’S HALF-BROTHER…. One need look no further than its party platform to know the Texas Republican Party is, shall we say, a little unusual idiosyncratic. This is, after all, the same party committed, in writing, to eliminating Social Security, church-state separation, lessons on modern biology, income taxes, the Federal Reserve, and the minimum wage.

This week, however, the Texas GOP has stopped looking for the invasion of black helicopters, and started going after Barack Obama’s family. In a new “ad” — I use the word loosely — the state party argues that the presumptive Democratic nominee can’t be trusted, because he has a half-brother who’s poor. Seriously. The ad argues:

“Obama claims he’s looking out our families in an economic downturn but ask yourself this: If Obama cares so much about your family, why doesn’t he doesn’t take care of his own family first? Barack Obama lives in this house [image of Obama’s house], wants to live in this one [image of the White House], while his own brother lives in this one [image of Obama’s half-brother standing in front of a shack in Kenya].”

The ad, not surprisingly, uses the half-brother’s full name: George Hussein Onyango Obama.

On its face, this is pretty weak tea. For one thing, Obama has several half-siblings, and he’s met George exactly once. Second, if neglect towards half-siblings is going to become a campaign issue, Texas Republicans have a very poor sense of timing.

But let’s cut the nonsense — the Texas Republican Party isn’t concerned about George Obama. There’s a transparent subtext, which, once again, hopes to characterize Barack Obama as foreign, different, and somehow less than American. Even by Republican standards, this is unusually cheap and ugly.

Stay classy, Texas GOP.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation