Menendez gets the Cuba debate off to a bad start

MENENDEZ GETS THE CUBA DEBATE OFF TO A BAD START…. Sen. Robert Menendez’s (D-N.J.) push on U.S policy towards Cuba is a reminder of how frustrating the foreign policy debate has been for far too long.

Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ), a strong supporter of the U.S. trade embargo against Cuba, is launching a full-on battle this week to remove several provisions from the 2009 government spending bill that would open a small crack in the slammed door of relations with Havana.

Menendez fired a broadside at the Obama administration yesterday for backing a provision buried in the $410 billion spending bill, which must become law by next week in order to keep the government running. The New Jersey senator, a Cuban-American, objects to language in the bill that would allow Cuban-Americans to visit relatives on the island once a year and end limits on the sale of American food and medicines in Cuba. […]

The WaPo reports today that the senator has held up two Obama science nominees in an attempt to twist the arms of his fellow Dems.

Menendez supports a policy that hasn’t worked after decades of trying. That’s his right. But President Obama ran on a campaign platform that vowed to change U.S. policy towards Cuba, and managed to do quite well with Cuban-American voters. (Indeed, most Cuban Americans support lifting the counterproductive embargo.)

But Menendez isn’t just making his case to continue with a failed policy, he’s now blocking two White House nominees — Obama’s choices to be the head of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and the head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration — to get the senators’ attention on his Cuba-related concerns.

So, to summarize, Menendez supports Obama’s nominees, but won’t let the Senate vote on them until after he’s done complaining about a subtle change in a foreign policy that hasn’t worked after more than five decades of attempts.

Changing the U.S. policy towards Cuba is long overdue. Menendez’s stunt gets the broader policy debate off to a discouraging start.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation