Kirk’s killer kerfuffle

KIRK’S KILLER KERFUFFLE…. The story about Rep. Mark Kirk’s (R-Ill.) trip to China has been percolating this week, and it’s starting to pick up some steam.

If you’re just joining us, Kirk claimed this week to have traveled to China, America’s biggest creditor, where he encouraged Chinese officials not to believe the U.S. government when it comes to budget issues. It was, to my mind, one of the more striking examples in recent memory of an American lawmaker trying to undermine the United States on the international stage.

On Wednesday, the Washington Post noted the controversy (online, not in the print edition); the DCCC is keeping the pressure on; Illinois Democrats are calling on Kirk to retract his remarks; and last night, Rachel Maddow did a very good segment on the controversy.

Visit for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Note that Rachel’s guest, MarketWatch’s David Weidner, hardly a partisan or an ideologue, described Kirk’s remarks as “colossally stupid” and “dangerous,” adding that the Illinios Republican, preparing to seek statewide office, ran the risk of creating an “international incident.”

Under the circumstances, it’s not outside the realm of possibility to think Kirk’s conduct could prompt some kind of congressional censure. It would be a reasonable response to a lawmaker going overseas to deliberately undermine American interests.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation