Nothing to ‘take pride’ in

NOTHING TO ‘TAKE PRIDE’ IN…. The Washington Post‘s E.J. Dionne Jr. noted last week that Sen. Chuck Grassley (R) of Iowa, arguably the top Republican negotiator on health care reform, is “under immense pressure from Republican colleagues not to deal at all.” The Politico raised a similar point today, noting that Senate Republicans often see Grassley as “a Democratic enabler, playing into President Barack Obama’s strategy of winning a few GOP votes and calling the final product bipartisan.”

It seems like a helpful reminder that there’s no real point in Democratic lawmakers and the Democratic administration reaching out to a party that is actively opposed to any constructive discussions.

As for Grassley himself….

“I take pride with being an obstructionist,” he said, if that means scuttling a public option that could lead to a single-payer system.

Great. The top Republican senator working with the majority on a bipartisan compromise on health care reform is so opposed to a sensible public option, he takes “pride” in calling himself an “obstructionist.”

This is the same Grassley who, when asked by a constituent how he can get the same kind of health care options members of Congress have, said, “You can. Just go work for the federal government.”

Perhaps there are some other Senate Republicans that Democrats can talk to about reform options? I’m starting to get the sense that maybe, just maybe, Grassley isn’t committed to the process.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation