THERE’S NO NEED TO ‘CHANGE THE RULES’…. It recently became clear that the Senate’s reconciliation process may play a role in health care reform. And the moment it did, word apparently went out to the media that reconciliation is something radical, abusive, and dangerous.
Fox News anchor Jamie Colby falsely characterized Senate Democrats passing health care reform legislation with a simple majority through a process known as reconciliation as “potentially changing the rules with the nuclear option.”
Yes, if senators follow Senate rules, they’re now changing Senate rules.
Labeling reconciliation the “nuclear option” is itself ridiculous, but to argue to a national television audience that using the process would be “changing the rules” is insane.
This would be a perfectly fair description of the actual “nuclear option.” In 2005, Senate Republicans, outraged by Democratic efforts to block some of Bush’s far-right judicial nominees, came up with a scheme to change the rules in the middle of the game. The Senate can change its rules with 67 votes, but Trent Lott & Co. thought they’d try it with 51 votes. Senate Dems, at the time, threatened all-out political war over this, which is why Lott referred to his underhanded scheme as the “nuclear option.” (It was never executed, and the Gang of 14 struck a deal that let conservative judicial nominees get confirmed.)
Reconciliation, in contrast, is part of the existing Senate rules. No one’s talking about changing anything — just following the process that’s already in place. It’s a process that Republicans have used and endorsed many times.
The right can’t govern, but when it comes to message dissemination, they’re Propagandists Extraordinaire.