They want to run the joint

THEY WANT TO RUN THE JOINT…. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), the cantankerous member of the Gang of Six who spent the summer trashing health care reform, announced that he’s withholding support for the Baucus framework because “there’s no guarantee” that it will remain unchanged.

As the conservative Iowan sees it, after the bill leaves committee, the bill is likely to be altered. Democrats, Grassley said, have not yet “made a commitment” to simply let the Gang of Six write the final bill.

Greg Sargent explained how silly this is.

Grassley’s position really appears to be that a key reason he can’t back the bill now is that Dems haven’t sworn a blood-oath not to do a bill alone later if no bill emerges that can get “broad” Republican support. This amounts to asking Dems to promise in advance to do nothing at all in the event that a “broad” number of Republicans don’t agree to get behind some kind of compromise bill.

By this standard, in order to satisfy Grassley’s definition of true bipartisanship, Dems quite literally must cede all their power and leverage in advance, even as Republicans are refusing en masse to back any proposal that can reasonably be called a compromise. That really is Grassley’s position, with no exaggeration.

Quite right. I’d only add that this position is the same one Sen. Mike Enzi, the conservative Wyoming Republican who’s also been part of the Gang of Six, articulated in late July.

He issued a statement demanding “commitments” from the White House, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi that the Gang of Six bill would be the legislation sent to the president. Objections from other committees and other lawmakers were irrelevant — Enzi wanted assurances that his agreement would be untouched by either chamber.

Grassley and Enzi effectively decided that the entire legislative branch of government has six members — none of whom are liberal, and none of whom represent large, diverse states — who should be solely responsible for overhauling the health care system of the United States.

It’s quite a gang Baucus put together.

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation