College for Some or Some College for All?


College isn’t worth it. Joining the chorus of the college detractors, the Associated Press wonders if too many Americans are going to college, or something. According to the article:

Growing numbers of experts are challenging the assumption that a four-year degree is essential for real success.

Many economists and academics say more Americans should consider technical training or two-year schools, which have been embraced in Europe for decades. The experts cite evidence such as increasing student debt, stagnant graduation rates and a struggling job market flooded with overqualified degree-holders.

Really? “Growing numbers of experts.” It’s not actually clear that anyone ever had the assumption that a four-year degree is essential for real success. Virtually all talk of “college for all” by economists and academics was always really more about community and technical college than a four year degree. The trouble is that currently American community and technical colleges tend to do a sort of crappy job at career training.

The solution might well be to improve these institutions (check out the Jamie Merisotis and Stan Jones Monthly article about how to do this) and make them more effective at helping people train to get good jobs. Knocking the straw man “college for all,” however, is just a waste of time. [Image via]

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation

Daniel Luzer

Daniel Luzer is the news editor at Governing Magazine and former web editor of the Washington Monthly. Find him on Twitter: @Daniel_Luzer