Steele ‘not comfortable’ with some Rand Paul views

STEELE ‘NOT COMFORTABLE’ WITH SOME RAND PAUL VIEWS…. Rand Paul, the Republicans’ U.S. Senate candidate in Kentucky, has repeatedly stated his opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This morning, ABC’s Jake Tapper asked RNC Chairman Michael Steele if he’s “comfortable with” Paul’s extreme ideology.

“I’m not comfortable with a lot of things,” Steele said.

“It sounds like you’re not comfortable with it,” Tapper said.

“I just said I wasn’t comfortable with it,” Steele replied.

Well, Steele hadn’t just said that, but it looks like he got there eventually.

The RNC chief added that Paul is motivated by a “philosophical position” and “philosophical perspective.” I suspect that’s probably true. But that doesn’t change the fact that Rand Paul’s political worldview is a) is poorly thought out; b) not even close to the American mainstream; and c) the kind of political philosophy that leads to unacceptable real-world consequences.

In other words, it’s not much of a defense. Steele’s point seems to be that Rand Paul is motivated by racism. That may be true. But when a U.S. Senate candidate in the 21st century opposes the Civil Rights Act, it’s hardly acceptable for his allies to argue, “It’s O.K.; his opposition is ‘philosophical.'”

As for the electoral context, Steele, who had to know Tapper’s question was coming, just handed Democrats a script for a campaign ad in Kentucky: “How extreme is Rand Paul? Even the Republican National Committee has said it’s ‘not comfortable’ with Paul’s ideology.”

Support Nonprofit Journalism

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Washington Monthly was founded in 1969 to tell the stories of how government really works—and how to make it work better. Fifty years later, the need for incisive analysis and new, progressive policy ideas is clearer than ever. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.

Yes, I’ll make a donation